Skip to main content
All issues
NYVO Weekly · #8· 12 June 2026· 6 min read·By Harsh Soni

Forget the Rockets. Look at What Google Is Paying SpaceX For.

SpaceX and Google connected by a stream of money, with rockets, satellites and xAI data centres

Everyone has heard of SpaceX. Most people think of rockets. A few think of Starlink. Almost nobody thinks of Google paying $920 million every single month to SpaceX.

The much spoken about IPO has more to the story.

A history lesson first

Before we get to SpaceX, let’s go back to 2010.

Tesla went public that year. Small company. Niche product. One car – a two-seat sports car priced above $100,000. But $290 million in accumulated losses. The Model S was still in the lab. Goldman Sachs initiated with a Neutral. Many called it overvalued.

And yet – Elon Musk was attached to it. And that changed something in how people saw the numbers.

This is the halo effect: when one thing about a person or company is impressive enough, it colours everything else.

Musk had PayPal. He had a vision. He spoke about first principles and civilisational missions. And slowly, the losses stopped looking like losses and started looking like investments in something bigger.

The people who bought Tesla in 2010 and held – through all the losses – made returns that look almost fictional today.

₹8 lakh
invested at the Tesla IPO, 2010
₹25 crore
what that holding is worth today

Source: CNBC

Now Musk is back. Bigger company. Bigger losses. Bigger story. And the halo is brighter than ever.

Same playbook. Different scale.

SpaceX is being sold as the new Tesla. The framing is irresistible: visionary founder, years of losses the market misunderstood, generational upside for those brave enough to see it early.

But look at the actual numbers and the parallel starts to emerge. Tesla at IPO was tiny and loss-making. SpaceX is enormous and loss-making.

Tesla IPO – 2010SpaceX IPO – 2025
Valuation at IPO~$2B – ~10× revenue at listing$1.75 trillion – ~94× annual revenue
Losses at IPO$290M cumulative losses$4.94B in 2025 + $4.28B in Q1 2026 alone
What losses are fundingThe Model S – a mass-market product that eventually sold to millions of ordinary peoplexAI – Musk’s AI company: $6.4B operating loss in 2025, $7.7B capex in Q1 2026

Sources: SEC filings, TechCrunch

Tesla’s losses were funding the Model S – a product that eventually sold to millions of ordinary people. SpaceX’s losses are substantially funding xAI, Musk’s AI company, which he merged into SpaceX earlier this year.

xAI lost $6.4 billion from operations in 2025 and consumed another $7.7 billion in capital expenditure in Q1 2026 alone. Retail investors buying the SpaceX IPO are partly funding a separate AI bet.

The halo effect doesn’t ask you to read the filing. It just asks you to trust the founder.

You think you know what SpaceX does

Most people buying this IPO think they’re buying rockets. Maybe Starlink. Maybe Musk’s vision of Mars.

But quietly, while the rocket coverage dominated headlines, SpaceX became something else entirely.

Google – one of the most powerful technology companies on earth, with its own data centres, its own chips, its own cloud infrastructure – is renting computers from SpaceX.

$920 million a month. Through 2029. To run its own AI models.

Source: RTE

Read that again.

Anthropic is paying SpaceX $1.25 billion a month for the same reason. That’s over $2 billion a month from just two customers – before Starlink revenue, before a single launch contract.

Over $2 billion a month – from two customers

Monthly payments to SpaceX for AI computing, before any Starlink or launch revenue

Google · $920M/moAnthropic · $1.25B/mo
$2.17B / month

Sources: RTE, Yahoo Finance · contracts run through 2029

Sources: RTE, Yahoo Finance

Why would Google, with hundreds of billions in cloud infrastructure, go to a rocket company for computing power? Because Google Cloud’s own backlog nearly doubled to $460 billion in Q1 2026.

AI demand is growing faster than even the biggest players can build for. SpaceX had the GPUs. SpaceX had the data centres. SpaceX stepped in.

This isn’t a rocket story. It isn’t even a Starlink story. It’s a story about a company that now controls three chokepoints simultaneously – at a moment when demand for all three is unlike anything the world has seen before.

Satellite internet
Starlink – the network everyone knows.
Launch capacity
A monopoly on launch capacity – the part that made the headlines.
Computing infrastructure
Over $2B a month from Google and Anthropic alone.

That’s where the valuation premium is potentially coming in.

So what’s the catch?

Morningstar values SpaceX at $780 billion. The IPO wants $1.75 trillion.

What it’s worth vs what it’s asking

SpaceX valuation, US$ billions

Morningstar fair value$780B
The IPO is asking$1.75T

Sources: Morningstar, CNBC

That’s a $970 billion gap – roughly the GDP of the Netherlands – that relies on faith.

Sources: Morningstar, CNBC

Faith in the infrastructure moat. Faith in the AI bet. Faith in the founder. Two of those three are measurable.

The infrastructure moat
Measurable. The Google and Anthropic contracts are real. The monopoly on launch capacity is real.
The AI bet
Measurable – and worrying. The xAI losses are accelerating, not narrowing.
The founder
Not measurable. This one runs on faith alone.

SpaceX might be the next Tesla. The infrastructure story is genuinely compelling and genuinely underreported. But the question worth asking before you invest isn’t “do I believe in Elon Musk?”

It’s: do I understand what I’m actually buying – and am I paying for the business, or for the story?

Right now, for most people, it’s the story.

NYVO Weekly

Get the NYVO Weekly direct to your inbox.

Every Monday. One practical money idea, math worked out. Free, no spam.

By subscribing, you agree to receive the NYVO weekly newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

SEBI-registered · 0+ on the waitlist